The short answer
LinkedIn recommends a background photo of 1584 by 396 pixels and a profile photo of at least 400 by 400, both JPG or PNG and under 8MB. Beyond the specifications, the useful advice is short: a recent, well-lit head-and-shoulders photograph taken on a phone by a window is entirely sufficient, and the banner is free space that most people leave on the default blue.
What matters most
- Background photo: 1584 by 396 pixels is LinkedIn's recommendation, JPG or PNG, under 8MB.
- Profile photo: at least 400 by 400 pixels, JPG or PNG, under 8MB. GIFs are not supported.
- A phone photograph in daylight next to a window is genuinely fine. A studio shoot is not required.
- In the US, employers may not base decisions on the characteristics a photograph reveals — which is a legal constraint on them, not a reason for you to leave it off.
The specifications
| Profile photo | Background photo (banner) | |
|---|---|---|
| Recommended size | At least 400 x 400 pixels | 1584 x 396 pixels |
| Maximum size | 7680 x 4320 pixels | No stated maximum dimension |
| File types | PNG or JPG | PNG or JPG |
| Maximum file size | 8MB | Under 8MB |
| Displayed shape | Circular crop, so avoid detail at the corners | Wide strip, cropped differently on mobile and desktop |
| Animated files | Not supported | Not supported |
Those figures are LinkedIn's own, from its help pages on profile photo uploads and background photos. Two consequences are worth pulling out. The profile photo is displayed as a circle, so anything important near the corners of a square image will be cut. And the banner is cropped differently depending on the device, with a chunk of the lower left obscured by your profile photo on desktop — so text placed centrally or on the right survives, and text placed low and left generally does not.
What a good profile photo actually needs
Considerably less than the industry around it suggests. The purpose is narrow: to confirm that a real, current, professionally engaged person is behind the profile. A photograph that achieves that is a good photograph, whatever it cost.
- Recent — within a couple of years, and recognisably you as you would arrive at an interview.
- Head and shoulders, with your face taking up most of the frame rather than a distant figure.
- Well lit, ideally by daylight from in front of you. Facing a window beats any amount of equipment.
- A plain or uncluttered background. A wall, a doorway, an out-of-focus room.
- Dressed as you would be for an interview in your industry, which differs enormously between a hospital and a design studio.
- Looking at the camera, with an expression you would be comfortable meeting someone in.
- Cropped so nothing important sits in the corners, since the display is circular.
And what it does not need: a photographer, a suit if you work somewhere nobody wears one, or a neutral grey studio backdrop. A phone camera on a bright day, held at eye level by a colleague, produces a perfectly good result. The important variables are light and framing, and both are free.
What to avoid
The failures are consistent and easy to fix. A group photograph where the reader has to guess which person you are. A photograph so old it is a different haircut and a different decade. A holiday picture with sunglasses. A logo where a face should be, on a personal profile. A heavy filter. A photograph so low-resolution it goes soft at profile size. And a completely blank avatar, which does not read as principled privacy so much as an abandoned account.
The banner, which is free space
The default background is a plain gradient that tells the reader you have not been into the settings. Replacing it is a small signal that you maintain the profile, and it is the one piece of genuinely free real estate you have — a wide strip at the top of the page, visible before anything else, that nobody is competing with you for.
What it should not be is a busy collage or a wall of small text, because it is cropped differently on every device and read for about half a second. One idea, large enough to survive scaling.
A stock photograph of a glass office tower with a motivational quote in a script font across the middle.
A plain deep-navy field with one line of text, right of centre: "Warehouse operations — 3PL and ecommerce fulfilment".
Six logos of tools you are certified in, tiled edge to edge at small size.
A photograph of your own work — a site you managed, a product you built, a room you designed — with nothing written on it at all.
- A photograph of your work. The strongest option where the work is visual: a build, a site, a dish, a garment, an installation, a workshop.
- A plain colour with one line of text. Understated, always legible, and it puts your specialism above your headline. Keep the text right of centre.
- A relevant place. A ward, a plant floor, a lecture theatre, a workshop bench. Context, without saying anything.
- Your employer's brand banner. Many companies publish one for staff, which is safe and slightly anonymous. Fine while employed, worth replacing when you are looking.
- Nothing but a colour. Entirely acceptable. A plain, deliberate colour reads far better than a default gradient or a badly cropped photograph.
The question about photographs and bias
It comes up, and it deserves a straight answer rather than a reassurance. A photograph reveals characteristics — age, race, sex, and sometimes disability or religion — that in the US employers are prohibited from basing hiring decisions on, under the rules the EEOC administers. That prohibition governs the employer's conduct. It does not make bias impossible, and nobody honest claims otherwise.
The practical position is nonetheless clear. LinkedIn is not an anonymous application channel and was never designed as one: your name, your work history and your education are all on the page, and a missing photograph does not make the profile anonymous — it makes it look inactive. If you are uncomfortable with a photograph, the reasonable response is a neutral, plain, professional one rather than none.
The resume is a different matter. US and UK resumes do not carry a photograph, and adding one there is a genuine mistake rather than a stylistic choice — some employers discard photographed resumes as a compliance measure. The CV versus resume guide covers where that convention does and does not apply, since parts of continental Europe still expect one.
Consistency across your professional presence
Use the same photograph across the professional places you appear — LinkedIn, a professional body listing, a conference programme, your email avatar. Recognition is the entire point of a profile picture, and three different photographs across three sites quietly undermine it. It also matters at the practical end: an interviewer who has looked at your profile should recognise you in reception.
Fifteen minutes, start to finish
- 1Take the photograph
Stand facing a window in daylight, have someone take four or five at eye level from about a metre and a half away, and pick the one where you look like yourself.
- 2Crop it square
Face filling most of the frame, a little space above the head, nothing important near the corners — the display crop is circular.
- 3Build or choose a banner
At 1584 by 396, with any text right of centre and clear of the lower left where your photo sits on desktop.
- 4Upload and check on a phone
The mobile crop differs from desktop. Look at your own profile in the app before deciding you are finished.
- 5Check the rest of the top of the profile
The images buy you a second of attention and the headline spends it. Make sure the two are working together.
Once the images are done, the text is what does the remaining work. The headline guide and the About section guide cover the two fields directly beneath them, and the profile audit scores the text you paste in. If the resume is next on the list, the template gallery and the builder handle the document side — and no, none of those templates has a photograph slot for US and UK applications, deliberately.
Questions people actually ask
What size should a LinkedIn banner be?
LinkedIn recommends 1584 by 396 pixels, as a JPG or PNG under 8MB. Start from something larger and let the platform scale it down, because upscaling a small image is what makes banners look blurry.
What size should a LinkedIn profile photo be?
At least 400 by 400 pixels and no larger than 7680 by 4320, as a PNG or JPG up to 8MB. It is displayed as a circle, so keep anything important away from the corners.
Do I need a professional photographer for my LinkedIn photo?
No. A phone photograph taken in daylight facing a window, cropped to head and shoulders, does the job. Light and framing matter; equipment mostly does not.
Should I put a photo on my LinkedIn profile if I am worried about bias?
LinkedIn is not an anonymous channel — your name, history and education are on the page regardless — and a missing photo tends to read as an inactive account. A plain, neutral photograph is the usual compromise. Your resume is a separate case, and in the US and UK it should carry no photograph at all.
What should I put on my LinkedIn banner?
One idea, large: a photograph of your actual work, or a plain colour with a single line naming your specialism. Keep text right of centre so your profile photo does not cover it on desktop.